- #Fspassengers x aerobatic gs upgrade#
- #Fspassengers x aerobatic gs Pc#
- #Fspassengers x aerobatic gs simulator#
- #Fspassengers x aerobatic gs mac#
(and i'm a secret fan boy of their corp enterprise products for my sins.) i think they've dropped the ball here. i would happily pay reasonable prices that would enable me to eek more out of fsx. hopefully fsx will keep us going for a while - the aces guys should form up their own company and make quality add ons for fsx. Interestingly (and with the obligatory wikipedia 'pinch of salt'), have a butchers at this:-Įnd of an era. why? because it was a good product (little details side).
#Fspassengers x aerobatic gs upgrade#
How many of us who use FSX\FS9 have been using this product since the early days? buying upgrade after upgrade. Whereas FS has been a mainstay of profitability for microsoft with a long-lasting loyal customer base (albeit a little niche).
#Fspassengers x aerobatic gs mac#
we dont' care who we buy what from and what sticker is on the box (unless there's mac boys around!). and the world\home\front-room domination game they're playing, but we don't care about that. fully understand the 'strategic direction' etc. dx10 'preview' a little dodgy in accelleration though. fsx is a beast there's not doubt, but personally i'm more than happy with what my Q6600, BadAxe2 mobo, 4Gb ram with vista, and a Geforce 8800 GTS (320MB) can do with it. if you try and run fs2000 on a 286 with16MB RAM then it's going to hurt. I have to disagree with the people complaining about lagginess.
#Fspassengers x aerobatic gs Pc#
used every version since and built my current pc specifically around getting the best out of FSX. Used this baby since FS2 - might even have been on the Atari ST and pre-Microsoft. But until then, it's just something different, but not necessarily better. Maybe with MS effectively killing FS, I'll be switching to X-Plane. I would like to switch to X-Plane, but until the above two issues are rectified, it's just not an alternative. I've also considered the virtual cockpits in X-Plane to be inferior to MSFS's too (and I'm sure that can be corrected in any high-quality add-on). The problem for X-Plane, IMO, has been that there just aren't as many high-quality payware (or even freeware) add-on aircraft for it. However, many of the add-on planes for MSFS significantly improve the realism vs the default MSFS planes, and even the default X-Plane planes.
Comparing the default X-plane planes to the default MSFS planes, the X-plane ones tend to win. On paper, its aerodynamics engine is a more accurate and precise engine than MSFS, but in practice it still comes down to how well the particular aircraft is modelled in the particular flight sim. I'm an MSFS person (have been using it since version 3 and nearly every version since), but I have tried X-Plane. Anything that helps with this is good (Zune), anything that doesn't isn't good (Flight Simulator). MS want to dominate the home entertainment market (games and video) and this involves getting their own custom and locked down system into as many homes as possible. It's no accident that MS is massively subsidising the x-box hardware and the marketing of its games and actively encouraging family games and the home-brew x-box live game developers. the family games that make the Wii so popular) it would be a very niche and non-family/mainstream product and therefore hardly worth bothering about.
#Fspassengers x aerobatic gs simulator#
Should Flight Simulator be moved onto the X-Box then compared to the mainstream games (e.g. Flight Simulator, no matter how good it is, does not fit into this plan. This domination will allow them enormous influence and give them a huge, regular income. Zune might (OK, there's no "might" about it) be entirely crap, unstable and unusable, however it is one of the pillars of MS's attempted domination of everything in the home - phone, media centre, communications, storage, media player, video on demand, games on demand, etc.
0 kommentar(er)
